The ADDIE and living systems model for knowledge management system (KM) models of instructional design for computer-based instruction feature similar design elements such as analysis, design and development, implementation, and evaluation. However, the two models are different in approach and delivery. The more traditional mechanistic ADDIE requires the designer to systematically identify, define and determine needs and goals, design, demonstrate, develop and deliver at each of the five phases in the knowledge-building cycle. Essential elements (such as learners, outcomes, assessments, activities, and evaluation) spiral through each phase for synthesis. Furthermore, the ADDIE model promotes a collaborative effort with the client and other expertise to improve the design into an effective end product.
In contrast, the living systems model for KM functions similarly to that of the brain. The digital nervous system projects a building system that adjusts to its environment. The continuously changing environment shapes and changes the structure and culture. The system allows users to contribute feedback and information to enrich learning. In order to balance the system, the KM model incorporates a cycle of phases (Analyze end-user requirements, design instructional information architecture, develop instructional interaction design, develop instructional information design, implement system design, and conduct developmental evaluation) to accommodate and support its evolution. An end product does not exist for the KM model. On the contrary, data collection and ongoing assessment modifies the system.
As a novice to instructional design of my Web site, the mechanistic and traditional design ADDIE, while keeping in mind the components and functions of the living systems model would benefit my revision. ADDIE’s step-by-step linear design elements of focus on the learners and outcomes would assist the development and delivery. Feedback from focus groups and assessment would allow me to synthesize any possible obstacles. When the Web site is actually functioning, then user input would be important to the longevity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This is a good summary of these two models. You presented the main features of the ADDIE model very clearly and succinctly. One thing that I think is also important about the living systems model is that rather than going around in a loop where the evaluation is the last step as in ADDIE, the living systems model constantly evaluates itself at every juncture.
-Laura
Nice summary. i think this article might be especially important to your website. As i understand thing, you may have users post their owen memoirs. So promoting this feature will involve a bit of smart design to get users to understand how to post their thoughts and search through an archive. It can quickly get messy if you have hundreds of postings. Thinking about these types of challenges is what that living system design model is all about. CHEERS!
Post a Comment